ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 報告書・レポート
  2. IDE Discussion Paper
  3. 2020

Electoral transfers of power and presidential candidate selection in Sub-saharan Africa

https://doi.org/10.20561/00051691
https://doi.org/10.20561/00051691
1e60e6f1-a4ad-401f-89ac-d1a600577c99
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
IDP000782_001.pdf Full-text PDF (261.8 kB)
Item type アジ研テクニカルレポート / IDE Technical Report(1)
公開日 2020-03-31
タイトル
タイトル Electoral transfers of power and presidential candidate selection in Sub-saharan Africa
言語
言語 eng
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 electoral transfers of power
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 presidential candidate selection|Political system
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh
資源タイプ technical report
ID登録
ID登録 10.20561/00051691
ID登録タイプ JaLC
著者 Tsubura, Machiko

× Tsubura, Machiko

WEKO 59168

Tsubura, Machiko

Search repository
著者別名
粒良,麻知子
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Drawing on Tsubura’s studies (2019a; 2019b) that analyse how presidential candidates have been selected and critical defections avoided among dominant parties in countries of sub-Saharan Africa (hereinafter referred to as Africa) that have regular presidential succession, the present paper examines presidential candidate selection among ruling parties that have failed to establish one-party dominance in Africa. Specifically, this paper explores whether electoral transfers of power in the region are attributable to the failure to maintain party coherence in the selection of new presidential candidates. The paper conducts a two-stage analysis. First, it proposes a typology of electoral transfers of power in Africa by identifying two major dimensions: 1) whether ruling parties were dominant or non-dominant when they first lost multi-party elections and 2) whether ruling parties lost incumbent or open-seat elections. This classification reveals that no dominant party has lost open-seat elections in Africa, suggesting that, once one-party dominance is established, the dominant party is likely to continue managing leadership succession successfully. The second stage of the paper analyses presidential candidate selection of 1) non-dominant parties that lost open-seat elections and 2) a dominant party that lost an incumbent election. The two sets of analysis suggest that the maintenance of party cohesion in presidential candidate selection may have been more critical for the establishment of dominant-party systems than for their endurance in Africa.
権利
権利情報 Copyrights 2020 by author(s)
収録情報 IDE Discussion Paper
en : IDE Discussion Paper

巻 782, 発行日 2020-03
出版者
出版者 Institute of Developing Economies (IDE-JETRO)
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
DIG_NO
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 IDP000782_001
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-07-27 16:00:24.735662
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3