WEKO3
アイテム
Politicisation of the appointment and removal of judges in a declining democracy : the case of Bangladesh
https://doi.org/10.20561/00050854
https://doi.org/10.20561/0005085424be4e65-63b1-4a77-af8d-83a872f27423
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
Full-text PDF (324.5 kB)
|
|
| Item type | アジ研テクニカルレポート / IDE Technical Report(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2019-04-18 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Politicisation of the appointment and removal of judges in a declining democracy : the case of Bangladesh | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh | |||||
| 資源タイプ | technical report | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.20561/00050854 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 著者 |
Asano, Noriyuki
× Asano, Noriyuki× Minato, Kazuki |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 浅野,宜之 | ||||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 湊,一樹 | ||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | In Bangladesh, the judiciary has adjudicated important political issues, particularly cases of constitutional amendments. On the other hand, the judiciary has been utterly politicised against a backdrop of deep-seated antagonism and mistrust between the two major political parties. Although the related literature tends to focus on either the judicialisation of politics or the politicisation of the judiciary alone, this paper argues that politicisation and judicialisation have coexisted and the relative importance of these two factors can change depending on the type of issue dealt with by the judiciary. Accordingly, this paper takes up the latest constitutional amendment case as an example, in which the Supreme Court struck down a significant constitutional change in the procedure for the removal of judges. In so doing, we demonstrate that, while judicial appointments had been deeply politicised for decades, judges across the political spectrum were very keen to uphold judicial autonomy vis-à-vis the executive branch. However, as the current regime has become increasingly authoritarian after “landslide victories” in general elections in 2014 and 2018, it seems more likely that the politicisation (and possibly the subjugation) of the judiciary has played a dominant role in recent years. | |||||
| 権利 | ||||||
| 権利情報 | Copyrights 日本貿易振興機構（ジェトロ）アジア経済研究所 / Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization (IDE-JETRO) http://www.ide.go.jp | |||||
| 収録情報 |
IDE Discussion Paper en : IDE Discussion Paper 巻 758, 発行日 2019-04 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | Institute of Developing Economies (IDE-JETRO) | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 地域/国名 | ||||||
| 位置情報（自由記述） | Bangladesh | |||||
| キーワード(LSH) | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Bangladesh | |||||
| キーワード(LSH) | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | judicialisation of politics | |||||
| キーワード(LSH) | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | appointment and removal of judges | |||||
| キーワード(LSH) | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Justice | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| DIG_NO | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | IDP000758_001 | |||||
