WEKO3
アイテム
Understanding Asian investment regime complexity : what to do about it?
https://doi.org/10.20561/00037556
https://doi.org/10.20561/0003755632358487-e314-4e0f-8be2-ba240332749a
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
本文 (357.3 kB)
|
|
| Item type | アジ研テクニカルレポート / IDE Technical Report(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-01-11 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Understanding Asian investment regime complexity : what to do about it? | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh | |||||
| 資源タイプ | technical report | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.20561/00037556 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 著者 |
Chaisse, Julien
× Chaisse, Julien× Hamanaka, Shintaro |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 値 | 浜中, 慎太郎 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | This study examines the evolving international regime for investment. It focuses on the Asian experience, which has not been extensively studied thus far unlike trade agreements. Existing studies mainly focus on the interpretation and application of international investment agreements (IIAs) in which the rules are given. In contrast, this study focuses on the development of rules, including investment protection. The noodle bowl syndrome of IIAs is potentially a serious problem. While trade disputes are state-to-state, an investment dispute involves investors who try to protect their investment using IIAs, such as the well-known case of Philip Morris, which launched proceedings against Australia via an Asian subsidiary using the Hong Kong–Australia Bilateral Investment Treaty. Furthermore, each IIA can conveniently import "better" provisions from other IIAs using its MFN clause, which significantly complicates the interpretation of IIAs. Because three factors affect the magnitude of noodle bowl problems of investment, there are three ways to mitigate the problem. First, the scope of MFNs should be carefully drafted to limit the "mobility" of provisions, e.g., MFN treatment does not apply to investor–state dispute provisions or older IIAs. Second, while investors are mobile and tend to relocate their base to seek convenient IIA protection, there should be some discipline on such relocations. Just to fight against the policy in question, IIAs should not create an incentive for relocation after it is decided. Third, the mobility of countries should be enhanced, which means that countries should be able to accede to IIAs favorable to their investors through accession. An appropriate balance among the "mobility" of these three factors is important. | |||||
| 権利 | ||||||
| 権利情報 | Copyrights 日本貿易振興機構（ジェトロ）アジア経済研究所 / Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization (IDE-JETRO) http://www.ide.go.jp | |||||
| 収録情報 |
IDE Discussion Paper en : IDE Discussion Paper 巻 626, 発行日 2017-01 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | Institute of Developing Economies (IDE-JETRO) | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 338.92 | |||||
| 地域/国名 | ||||||
| 位置情報（自由記述） | アジア | |||||
| 地域/国名 | ||||||
| 位置情報（自由記述） | オーストラリア | |||||
| キーワード(LSH) | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Foreign investments | |||||
| キーワード(LSH) | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | International agreements | |||||
| キーワード(LSH) | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Investment treaties | |||||
| キーワード(LSH) | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | BIT | |||||
| キーワード(LSH) | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | FTA | |||||
| キーワード(LSH) | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Noodle bowl | |||||
| キーワード(LSH) | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Treaty shopping | |||||
| キーワード(LSH) | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| DIG_NO | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | IDP000626_001 | |||||
